Skip to main content

WE ARE ALL CRIMINALS: DEMYSTIFYING AND BLURRING THE THIN DIVIDING LINE BETWEEN CONFORMITY AND CRIMINALITY

    Introduction: The Uncomfortable Truth   “We are all criminals.” The statement sounds outrageous. It offends our moral sensibilities. It appears to insult the honest citizen, the religious devotee, the respected public servant, the loving parent, and the law-abiding professional. Yet, before dismissing it as absurd, it is worth examining what we mean by crime, criminality, conformity, and deviance.   The central argument of this essay is simple, yet profoundly disturbing: the line separating the criminal from the conformist or law-abiding person is far thinner than society is willing to admit. Indeed, that line is often so thin, so fragile, and so dependent on circumstance that many of us stand on both sides of it simultaneously.   To understand this, we must begin where all discussions of crime properly begin – not with the criminal, but with the law.   Crime Exists Because Law Exists A crime is not merely a harmful act. It is not simply an ...

DRAMATURGY AND THE NIGERIAN LEADERSHIP LANDSCAPE

 


Nigeria’s political stage is a grand theatre, where actors masquerade as leaders, delivering performances tailored for applause rather than progress. Erving Goffman’s concept of Dramaturgy, otherwise called the Conman Theory—where individuals present themselves in ways designed to control and influence their audience—perfectly encapsulates the chameleonic nature of Nigerian politicians. They are not driven by ideological convictions or a deep-seated passion for national development; rather, they are political performers, switching costumes, adjusting scripts, and defecting from one party to another in pursuit of personal gain. The question remains: can Nigeria ever ascend beyond this charade, or are we doomed to a perpetual cycle of deceit?

 The Art of Defection: Politics Without Conviction

In most thriving democracies, political parties are rooted in distinct ideologies—conservatism, liberalism, socialism—shaping policies and governance. In Nigeria, however, parties are mere vehicles for electoral success, without defining principles or lasting loyalties. Politicians jump ship at will, not because of policy disagreements but to secure personal advantages.

 The political trajectory of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has been a spectacle of shifting allegiances. From the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC) and back to the PDP, Atiku’s movements reflect a broader pattern where self-interest trumps ideology. Similarly, ex-Governor Peter Obi’s defection from the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) to the PDP, and eventually to the Labour Party, showcased a strategic recalibration aimed at maximizing electoral chances rather than fostering consistent governance principles. 

However, unlike other politicians, Obi’s last campaign in the 2023 elections seemed to mirror a shift toward a stable ideology. The Nigerian youth, disillusioned by the traditional power blocs, found conviction in him, rallying behind a movement that represented integrity, competence, and a break from the past. If Obi had come to power, perhaps he could have laid the foundation for a new ideological approach to leadership—one rooted in service rather than self-interest. Yet, in a political landscape where defections and opportunism reign, this vision remains uncertain.

 This political somersaulting breeds instability and weakens the democratic process. It sends a clear message to the electorate: political parties are not vehicles for national transformation but transient platforms for personal advancement.

The Tragedy of Leadership as Performance

In Goffman’s dramaturgical metaphor, politicians perform for their audience—the electorate—telling them what they want to hear, but behind the curtain, they pursue personal and sectional interests. This deception has dire consequences.

Take the case of former Governor Rochas Okorocha, who, after campaigning on the platform of free education and youth empowerment, left Imo State in shambles, riddled with unpaid salaries and abandoned projects. Reports detail the challenges faced by the state during his tenure. Or consider the APC’s promise of ‘Change’ in 2015—a rousing performance that captivated the audience but ultimately degenerated into economic hardship, insecurity, and infrastructural decay.

These actors do not lead with conviction; they rehearse lines, mimic concern, and exit the stage when their applause fades. And while they bow for the next performance, the people suffer—hunger intensifies, inflation skyrockets, and the nation remains in perpetual decline.  

 The Church and the Stage of Deception

Even the Christian Church is not left out of this drama. Church leadership, which should bring light to the Gentiles (Isaiah 49:6), be a role model, and exemplify the deeds of Christ and the virtues of truth, justice, and fairness, is now entangled in an even worse form of Dramaturgy. Its leaders don costumes reminiscent of Christ and the saints—not to preach salvation but to stage spiritually deceptive performances. They act out convincingly pious scripts with the precision of seasoned actors, manipulating the faith of their followers for personal gain, political influence, and social control.

This is perhaps the deadliest form of Dramaturgy. It not only leads the flock astray but also inspires and legitimizes the very deception among politicians and the electorate alike. When the church—the supposed moral compass of the nation—becomes a theater of illusions, where then shall truth be found? In this deadly mimicry, the boundary between sacred duty and theatrical pretence is blurred, leaving a nation further adrift.

A Nation Held Hostage by Political Theatre

The damage wrought by these political performers is immense. Their lack of ideology means policies are inconsistent, reforms are abandoned midway, and governance remains a revolving door of deception. Defections erode public trust, making governance transactional rather than transformative.

The only way forward is for Nigerian leaders to break free from this cycle and embody true statesmanship—one that transcends personal gain and is rooted in a commitment to national development. But this hope remains dim. The culture of political performance is deeply ingrained, and unless a new generation of leaders emerges with genuine conviction, the status quo may persist for decades.

The Curtain Falls, but the Show Must End

Nigeria stands at a precipice, watching as its leaders shuffle scripts and change costumes, acting out scenes that lead to nowhere. The audience—the people—have clapped long enough, sometimes out of hope, sometimes out of desperation. But for how long must we endure this tragic performance? 

A nation cannot build its future on illusions. It cannot continue to mistake costumes for character, or applause for progress. The curtain must not merely fall—it must be torn down. For, if leadership remains a stage play, the people will forever be cast as mere spectators in their own story, powerless against the grand deception.

Nigeria does not need another act, another promise, another well-rehearsed campaign. It needs leaders who will step off the stage and walk among the people, shedding pretences, embracing true governance, and making decisions that transcend self-interest. Only then can this performance end, and a new reality begin. Until then, the tragedy persists, and the greatest applause may yet be reserved for those who finally dare to tell the truth.

                                                                        OKOM, Emmanuel Njor (PhD)

You may also want to read ECCE HOMO (BEHOLD THE MAN): THE MIGHTIEST OF THEM ALL, where man's power to choose to serve the people or to serve their pockets is in their grasp.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHEN LEADERS LEAVE: THE SILENT DISTANCE BETWEEN THE DEPARTED AND THE LED

Leadership rarely ends with the closing of a door. When a leader departs, whether from political office, an institution, or a community, the relationship between the leader and the led does not instantly disappear. Instead, it enters a subtle phase of psychological, social, and historical distancing. This period is not a void but a complex space filled with the echoes of past authority and the quiet reorganization of collective life.  The moment of departure often creates a vacuum filled with mixed emotions: relief, nostalgia, criticism, hope, or even confusion. For the followers who remain behind, the departure becomes the beginning of a reflective journey – one that gradually reinterprets the past while confronting the realities of the present. This process, often overlooked in leader-centric narratives, is where the true legacy of leadership is forged in the hearts and minds of those left behind.   The Immediate Aftermath: Emotional Echoes and the “Network Aftershock” In th...

NIGERIA’S KAKISTOCRACY: THE REIGN OF MEDIOCRITY AND THE GHOSTS OF COLONIAL DOMINATION

The Absurd Paradox There is something disturbingly absurd about the Nigerian story. How does a country blessed with millions of educated citizens, thousands of professors, and countless men and women of God find itself perpetually ruled by mediocre leaders – individuals whose credentials and moral capacities often fall far short of the demands of modern governance? It is a paradox that mocks the very notion of enlightenment, a tragedy that blurs the line between divine punishment and historical misfortune.   The Colonial Blueprint and the Culture of Mediocracy Since 1914, when the British yoked together diverse nations into one fragile colonial creation, Nigeria has been caught in a web of deliberate underdevelopment and leadership inversion. The most unprepared often ascend the throne, while the best minds retreat into silence, prayer, or cynical detachment. We have become a land where mediocracy is celebrated and excellence exiled – a country where those who can govern refuse to ...

YOUR CHILDREN, NOT YOUR OWN

  It is a common yet flawed assumption that children belong to their parents. Many, particularly in African societies, operate under the illusion that biological connection equals ownership. But let us pause for a moment and reflect – who among us can claim ownership of another’s soul? Who among us chose their own entry into this world? The truth is as old as time itself: we do not own our children; they are God’s, lent to us for a time, to be raised and nurtured, not possessed and manipulated. The Divine Custodianship of Parenthood Children are not commodities to be controlled, coerced, or commanded at will. They are gifts from the Almighty, entrusted into our care for a fleeting season. Psalm 127:3 reminds us, “Lo, children are a heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward.” The language is clear: they are a heritage, not an acquisition. Parents are custodians, not owners. In Genesis, when God blessed humanity with the ability to multiply, He did not ...