Skip to main content

WE ARE ALL CRIMINALS: DEMYSTIFYING AND BLURRING THE THIN DIVIDING LINE BETWEEN CONFORMITY AND CRIMINALITY

    Introduction: The Uncomfortable Truth   “We are all criminals.” The statement sounds outrageous. It offends our moral sensibilities. It appears to insult the honest citizen, the religious devotee, the respected public servant, the loving parent, and the law-abiding professional. Yet, before dismissing it as absurd, it is worth examining what we mean by crime, criminality, conformity, and deviance.   The central argument of this essay is simple, yet profoundly disturbing: the line separating the criminal from the conformist or law-abiding person is far thinner than society is willing to admit. Indeed, that line is often so thin, so fragile, and so dependent on circumstance that many of us stand on both sides of it simultaneously.   To understand this, we must begin where all discussions of crime properly begin – not with the criminal, but with the law.   Crime Exists Because Law Exists A crime is not merely a harmful act. It is not simply an ...

Why Keep This Transient Spirit in This Perishable Frame? – A Philosophical Enquiry into Being and Nothingness


“For what is man in nature? A nothing in comparison with the infinite, a whole in comparison with the nothing, a mean between nothing and everything.”
 –  Blaise Pascal, Pensées

What strange defiance is this: that the soul, knowing well its fragility, clings still to life? That we, bound in bodies destined to wither, fight against the pull of the abyss? What force keeps the trembling heart beating, even when sorrow presses against the ribs like an iron band? What makes a man, weary of toil and loss, rise again with the sun, unwilling to surrender?

The question – Why keep this transient spirit in this perishable frame? – is not merely a philosophical riddle but a cry from the deepest chambers of the human condition. It is the plea of every suffering soul, the whispered anguish of the broken-hearted, the silent query of the lonely and the lost. It is the question asked in hospital rooms and warzones, in sleepless nights and moments of unbearable grief. It is the unuttered thought behind every sigh, every teardrop, every clenched fist against an unyielding fate.

And yet, against all logic, against all suffering  –  we persist. We endure. We love. We create.

Perhaps it is because the soul, though momentarily caged in frail flesh, knows that it was not made for mere oblivion. “The soul is in exile, and the body is its prison,” lamented Plotinus in his Enneads. Yet in that exile, we find purpose and possibility. There is the quiet knowledge, the unshaken instinct that whispers: You are meant for more.

The Crucible of Experience

The flesh may be weak, but it is through the body that the spirit is tested and refined. Without suffering, what is joy but a hollow mirage? Without struggle, what is triumph but an empty echo? Life, with all its bitterness and beauty, is the fire in which we are tempered.

“What does not kill me makes me stronger,” declared Nietzsche (Twilight of the Idols). For the ancient Stoics, too, pain was a teacher: “Difficulties strengthen the mind, as labour does the body,” wrote Seneca.

The poet Rainer Maria Rilke reminds us: “Let everything happen to you: beauty and terror. Just keep going. No feeling is final.” What is pain but the sculptor’s chisel, carving us into something greater?

The Sacred Bonds of Connection

A hand in another’s; a shared laugh in the midst of despair; the first cry of a newborn against a mother’s chest  – these moments, ephemeral and trembling, bind us to one another in ways that transcend time and flesh.

“Man is by nature a social animal,” wrote Aristotle (Politics). To touch, to hold, to embrace – is this not reason enough to remain? Love itself is a rebellion against impermanence, the quiet vow that though the body may perish, the echo of affection lingers.

“We live in the hearts we leave behind,” wrote Thomas Campbell, and perhaps that is the truest form of eternity. Even Augustine of Hippo, who wrestled deeply with sin, mortality, and longing, wrote: “What does love look like? It has the hands to help others, the feet to hasten to the poor and needy. It has eyes to see misery and want. That is what love looks like.”

In our bonds, we find the courage to bear existence.

The Call of Purpose

We are each burdened with the hunger to matter; to leave behind footprints that do not vanish with the tide. Søren Kierkegaard argued that despair arises when we fail to become our true self – when our existence loses its purpose. “The greatest hazard of all – losing one’s self  – can occur so quietly that it is as if it did not occur at all,” Kierkgaard noted in The Sickness Unto Death. Whether it is in the raising of a child, the building of a dream, or the simple act of kindness to a stranger – purpose pulls us forward when all else fails. We live, not just because we fear death, but because there is work yet to be done.

Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl wrote: “Those who have a ‘why’ to live can bear with almost any ‘how’.” (Man’s Search for Meaning). Purpose is the lantern in the darkness, the rope that pulls us from the pit.

The Instinct to Endure

And perhaps, most inexplicably, we go on simply because something deep within us demands it. Call it instinct, call it will, call it what Schopenhauer named it: the will to live – a blind, ceaseless striving at the root of all being. Even the Buddha, who taught detachment, acknowledged suffering as life’s foundation: “Life is suffering,” yet the Noble Eightfold Path exists because the spirit seeks liberation from that suffering.

“Survival is insufficient,” writes Emily St. John Mandel (Station Eleven), and yet survival is where it begins. We endure so that we may one day live –  truly live –  and not merely exist.

So, Why Do We Stay?

Because even in the wreckage, there is beauty. Because even in sorrow, there is love. Because even in the darkest of nights, there is the promise of a sunrise. “One must imagine Sisyphus happy,” wrote Albert Camus (The Myth of Sisyphus), for, though the rock (which he was eternally condemned by the gods to roll up the crest of the mountain) rolls back down the hill, the pushing is itself a testament: a defiance of the void.

And so, we remain – not because the journey is easy, but because it is ours. “To be is to be perceived,” said Bishop Berkeley; to be perceived by ourselves, by each other, by the world – this is enough to justify the fleeting breath.

Until the final exhalation escapes our lips, we will fight. Because life, however fleeting, however fragile, is worth it.

So we hold fast, mortal yet immortal in our longing, caged yet free in our hope – and though our frame may perish, our spirit remains unbowed.

                                       OKOM, Emmanuel Njor (PhD)

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHEN LEADERS LEAVE: THE SILENT DISTANCE BETWEEN THE DEPARTED AND THE LED

Leadership rarely ends with the closing of a door. When a leader departs, whether from political office, an institution, or a community, the relationship between the leader and the led does not instantly disappear. Instead, it enters a subtle phase of psychological, social, and historical distancing. This period is not a void but a complex space filled with the echoes of past authority and the quiet reorganization of collective life.  The moment of departure often creates a vacuum filled with mixed emotions: relief, nostalgia, criticism, hope, or even confusion. For the followers who remain behind, the departure becomes the beginning of a reflective journey – one that gradually reinterprets the past while confronting the realities of the present. This process, often overlooked in leader-centric narratives, is where the true legacy of leadership is forged in the hearts and minds of those left behind.   The Immediate Aftermath: Emotional Echoes and the “Network Aftershock” In th...

NIGERIA’S KAKISTOCRACY: THE REIGN OF MEDIOCRITY AND THE GHOSTS OF COLONIAL DOMINATION

The Absurd Paradox There is something disturbingly absurd about the Nigerian story. How does a country blessed with millions of educated citizens, thousands of professors, and countless men and women of God find itself perpetually ruled by mediocre leaders – individuals whose credentials and moral capacities often fall far short of the demands of modern governance? It is a paradox that mocks the very notion of enlightenment, a tragedy that blurs the line between divine punishment and historical misfortune.   The Colonial Blueprint and the Culture of Mediocracy Since 1914, when the British yoked together diverse nations into one fragile colonial creation, Nigeria has been caught in a web of deliberate underdevelopment and leadership inversion. The most unprepared often ascend the throne, while the best minds retreat into silence, prayer, or cynical detachment. We have become a land where mediocracy is celebrated and excellence exiled – a country where those who can govern refuse to ...

YOUR CHILDREN, NOT YOUR OWN

  It is a common yet flawed assumption that children belong to their parents. Many, particularly in African societies, operate under the illusion that biological connection equals ownership. But let us pause for a moment and reflect – who among us can claim ownership of another’s soul? Who among us chose their own entry into this world? The truth is as old as time itself: we do not own our children; they are God’s, lent to us for a time, to be raised and nurtured, not possessed and manipulated. The Divine Custodianship of Parenthood Children are not commodities to be controlled, coerced, or commanded at will. They are gifts from the Almighty, entrusted into our care for a fleeting season. Psalm 127:3 reminds us, “Lo, children are a heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward.” The language is clear: they are a heritage, not an acquisition. Parents are custodians, not owners. In Genesis, when God blessed humanity with the ability to multiply, He did not ...